Not considering the long-term outcomes of decisions that improve conditions in the short term, possibly creating a difficult situation for future generations.
They contribute liberally to political parties who look after their interests. Dahl is not deeply concerned about the limits of his polyarchy spectrum because he believes that most countries today still have a long way before they reach full polyarchy status. The decisions might take time but are very fine and supportive decisions.
Democracy is device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve and finally Report this Argument Con Alright, for this I will defend my arguments clarifying them and address as much of your arguments as I can.
Shach[ edit ] Israeli politician Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach promoted Judaic law to be the natural governance for Jews and condemned democracy, write any 3 arguments against democracy claimed that "Democracy as a machinery of lies, false notions, pursuit of narrow interests and deceit - as opposed to the Torah regime, which is based on seeking the ultimate truth.
As for my point on efficiency, debate and public input can still occur in a non-democratic government. This was an interesting debate, and I would like to thank Pro for participating.
Ruling party must give a clear ground to the contestants of the elections. After independence, Robert mugabe made himself the president.
The rich control the media and use it for their own benefit. That is, if the revolutionaries prioritized consent to be governed over equal opportunity to serve as the government, then their choice of elections over lotteries makes sense.
Afterall, the root is People should be happy. The report highlighted that: People are free to believe in and practice any religion. Susceptibility to propaganda[ edit ] See also: It arouses communal feeling among the people which sometimes lead to communal riots. Consider the following facts about a country and decide if you would call it a democracy.
Politicians hear most regularly about the concerns of business and the richest. Coalitions are frequently formed after the elections in many countries for example India and the basis of alliance is predominantly to enable a viable majority, not an ideological concurrence.
See also class notes: Now, with a leader appointing people, the person appointing people can consider all candidates, who all have an equal opportunity to be selected.
Think of the Libertarian Party. Write out the two separately for each statement. In any society, people are bound to have differences of opinions and interests. Being irrational in general.
Since all the international agencies fact certain conditions while giving loans, the country does not become undemocratic. University of California Press, He does not defend this phenomenon but rather seeks to describe it.
Advertising influence of a disproportionately wealthy upper class think campaign funding in the US - voters are very easily influenced by campaigns. The government is simply not dependent on input of the people. This leads to third parties being unviable. Such people are allowed special cut off marks or have reserved seats.
This concludes my paper on democracy and its critics. Prosperity of the people depends on the economic development and not on the form of government.
People, knowing that they have the rights gain confidence regadless of the fact whether they are the majority or the minority. Such a situation is not present in a democracy.
Pro Thank you Con, for your pointsClick here 👆 to get an answer to your question ️ Write any three arguments in favour and two against Democracy as a form of government CBSE Class IX Social Sc /5(65).
Write any three arguments against democracy? Advertisement Ask for details ; Follow; Report; by Dgbh4tka7tyenambe Log in to add a Democracy is all about political competition and power mint-body.com is no scope for morality.
3)So many people have to be consulted in a mint-body.com leads to political instability. 68 votes 68 /5(68). The Case Against Democracy there were only two practical arguments against epistocracy left standing. The first was the possibility that an epistocracy’s method of screening voters might be.
state any five arguments against democracy? Share with your friends. 1 Leaders keep changing in democracy so there is no stability.
2 Democracy is based on consultation and discussion so it lays to delays. 3 Leaders do not know the best interests of the people so this leads to bad dicissions/5(43). Give any three arguments in favour of democracy? Update Cancel. ad by Honey.
even the press can write against government and its policies which is minimal in other form of government. What are some arguments against a more direct democracy that are not also arguments against democracy as a whole?
While arguments against democracy are often taken by advocates of democracy as an attempt to maintain or revive traditional hierarchy and autocratic rule, many extensions have been made to develop the argument further. Criticism of democracy's outcome Mob rule Plato's.Download